The configuration of SQL server is
1. Windows 2000 server Standard version
2. SQL server 2000 standard
3. 3G memory
4. mainly run by IIS and SQL, sometimes word or excel triggered by IIS.
i have allocated all the memory to the SQL server at Enterprise manager.
i find at task manager the SQL uses up 1.8G memory at maximum.
The database size at disk is 600m
i find the server runs a query at 30 minutes.
After reboot, the query runs at 15 minutues, maybe release of some memory.
Can i say the memory is not sufficient for the SQL?
If yes, i know there is memory limitation from standard version of Windows
2K and SQL 2K, should i consider Enterprise version of Windows Server and
SQL to allow more memory.
Grateful if you could kindly give me some advices. Thanks.
TonyTony
First of all I'd suggest you staring to tune a 'bad' query , see if the
optomizer uses indexes , how efficient is an execution plan?
"tony wong" <x34@.netvigator.com> wrote in message
news:ebKNJg3NHHA.5064@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> The configuration of SQL server is
> 1. Windows 2000 server Standard version
> 2. SQL server 2000 standard
> 3. 3G memory
> 4. mainly run by IIS and SQL, sometimes word or excel triggered by IIS.
> i have allocated all the memory to the SQL server at Enterprise manager.
> i find at task manager the SQL uses up 1.8G memory at maximum.
> The database size at disk is 600m
> i find the server runs a query at 30 minutes.
> After reboot, the query runs at 15 minutues, maybe release of some memory.
> Can i say the memory is not sufficient for the SQL?
> If yes, i know there is memory limitation from standard version of Windows
> 2K and SQL 2K, should i consider Enterprise version of Windows Server and
> SQL to allow more memory.
> Grateful if you could kindly give me some advices. Thanks.
> Tony
>|||On Sun, 14 Jan 2007 09:05:08 +0800, "tony wong" <x34@.netvigator.com>
wrote:
>The configuration of SQL server is
>1. Windows 2000 server Standard version
>2. SQL server 2000 standard
>3. 3G memory
>4. mainly run by IIS and SQL, sometimes word or excel triggered by IIS.
>i have allocated all the memory to the SQL server at Enterprise manager.
>i find at task manager the SQL uses up 1.8G memory at maximum.
>The database size at disk is 600m
>i find the server runs a query at 30 minutes.
>After reboot, the query runs at 15 minutues, maybe release of some memory.
>Can i say the memory is not sufficient for the SQL?
>If yes, i know there is memory limitation from standard version of Windows
>2K and SQL 2K, should i consider Enterprise version of Windows Server and
>SQL to allow more memory.
>Grateful if you could kindly give me some advices. Thanks.
Generally you'd expect it to run slower after reboot, as the cache
would be empty and physical IO is a lot slower.
I'd say Uri has the right idea, you might be producing a huge join
that preferentially should be kept in memory, or missing an index that
causes some other unnatural memory/cache configuration to be optimal.
Generally these can be addressed by tuning the query.
Of course, a multitude of sins can be hidden if you have enough RAM!
J.|||> i find the server runs a query at 30 minutes.
> After reboot, the query runs at 15 minutues,
Can this be consistently reproduced?
Linchi
"tony wong" wrote:
> The configuration of SQL server is
> 1. Windows 2000 server Standard version
> 2. SQL server 2000 standard
> 3. 3G memory
> 4. mainly run by IIS and SQL, sometimes word or excel triggered by IIS.
> i have allocated all the memory to the SQL server at Enterprise manager.
> i find at task manager the SQL uses up 1.8G memory at maximum.
> The database size at disk is 600m
> i find the server runs a query at 30 minutes.
> After reboot, the query runs at 15 minutues, maybe release of some memory.
> Can i say the memory is not sufficient for the SQL?
> If yes, i know there is memory limitation from standard version of Windows
> 2K and SQL 2K, should i consider Enterprise version of Windows Server and
> SQL to allow more memory.
> Grateful if you could kindly give me some advices. Thanks.
> Tony
>
>
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment