Good afternoon,
I am trying to find out the Capacity Specifications when SQL Server
Enterprise Edition or Standard Edition is running on Windows 2003 Enterprise
Edition server. I have the specifications for Windows 2000 Server, but I
cannot find out the specs when W2K3 is the OS. I am looking for the maximum
memory allowed, number of processors, etc.
Thanks,
Robert
They should be the same.
"Robert Koros" <RobertKoros@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:9AD71CFD-E6B8-450D-B680-1F74BB955BBB@.microsoft.com...
> Good afternoon,
> I am trying to find out the Capacity Specifications when SQL Server
> Enterprise Edition or Standard Edition is running on Windows 2003
> Enterprise
> Edition server. I have the specifications for Windows 2000 Server, but I
> cannot find out the specs when W2K3 is the OS. I am looking for the
> maximum
> memory allowed, number of processors, etc.
> Thanks,
> Robert
|||Unfortunately they aren't. It would make sense, but there is a chart that I
saw for SQL Server 2000 running on W2K3 EE and there was a substanial
increase in the allowed memory, 32GB I believe. I am in the process of
building a new box/SAN and I want to know what the specs are for this OS.
"Bud Y. Zer" wrote:
> They should be the same.
> "Robert Koros" <RobertKoros@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:9AD71CFD-E6B8-450D-B680-1F74BB955BBB@.microsoft.com...
>
>
|||Ah, you're right. I read memory 'requirements' in your original post, not
'specifications'.
My mistake.
Now, what platform of SQL Server and windows are you running: 32bit or 64
bit?
This matrix might help:
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/evaluat...w/default.mspx
"Robert Koros" <RobertKoros@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:2B3AA119-EE86-4D94-ADCF-8B986937AB92@.microsoft.com...[vbcol=seagreen]
> Unfortunately they aren't. It would make sense, but there is a chart that
> I
> saw for SQL Server 2000 running on W2K3 EE and there was a substanial
> increase in the allowed memory, 32GB I believe. I am in the process of
> building a new box/SAN and I want to know what the specs are for this OS.
> "Bud Y. Zer" wrote:
|||I am running SQL Server Enterprise Edition, but I am adding some additional
servers and a SAN as the number of databases, and therefore the load on my
current production server, is expanding. I was/am hoping to use standard
edition in combination with enterprise edition to do some log shipping so
that I can build a reporting server.
Both the OS and the RDBMS are 32-bit for now, but moving to 64-bit in the
very near future.
Thanks for the matrix, I have been looking for that for the last couple of
days now. Much appreciated.
Thanks,
Robert
"Bud Y. Zer" wrote:
> Ah, you're right. I read memory 'requirements' in your original post, not
> 'specifications'.
> My mistake.
> Now, what platform of SQL Server and windows are you running: 32bit or 64
> bit?
> This matrix might help:
> http://www.microsoft.com/sql/evaluat...w/default.mspx
>
>
> "Robert Koros" <RobertKoros@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:2B3AA119-EE86-4D94-ADCF-8B986937AB92@.microsoft.com...
>
>
Showing posts with label specifications. Show all posts
Showing posts with label specifications. Show all posts
Friday, March 9, 2012
Memory Specifications for SS EE running on W2K3 EE
Good afternoon,
I am trying to find out the Capacity Specifications when SQL Server
Enterprise Edition or Standard Edition is running on Windows 2003 Enterprise
Edition server. I have the specifications for Windows 2000 Server, but I
cannot find out the specs when W2K3 is the OS. I am looking for the maximum
memory allowed, number of processors, etc.
Thanks,
RobertThey should be the same.
"Robert Koros" <RobertKoros@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:9AD71CFD-E6B8-450D-B680-1F74BB955BBB@.microsoft.com...
> Good afternoon,
> I am trying to find out the Capacity Specifications when SQL Server
> Enterprise Edition or Standard Edition is running on Windows 2003
> Enterprise
> Edition server. I have the specifications for Windows 2000 Server, but I
> cannot find out the specs when W2K3 is the OS. I am looking for the
> maximum
> memory allowed, number of processors, etc.
> Thanks,
> Robert|||Unfortunately they aren't. It would make sense, but there is a chart that I
saw for SQL Server 2000 running on W2K3 EE and there was a substanial
increase in the allowed memory, 32GB I believe. I am in the process of
building a new box/SAN and I want to know what the specs are for this OS.
"Bud Y. Zer" wrote:
> They should be the same.
> "Robert Koros" <RobertKoros@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:9AD71CFD-E6B8-450D-B680-1F74BB955BBB@.microsoft.com...
>
>|||Ah, you're right. I read memory 'requirements' in your original post, not
'specifications'.
My mistake.
Now, what platform of SQL Server and windows are you running: 32bit or 64
bit?
This matrix might help:
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/evalua...ew/default.mspx
"Robert Koros" <RobertKoros@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:2B3AA119-EE86-4D94-ADCF-8B986937AB92@.microsoft.com...[vbcol=seagreen]
> Unfortunately they aren't. It would make sense, but there is a chart that
> I
> saw for SQL Server 2000 running on W2K3 EE and there was a substanial
> increase in the allowed memory, 32GB I believe. I am in the process of
> building a new box/SAN and I want to know what the specs are for this OS.
> "Bud Y. Zer" wrote:
>|||I am running SQL Server Enterprise Edition, but I am adding some additional
servers and a SAN as the number of databases, and therefore the load on my
current production server, is expanding. I was/am hoping to use standard
edition in combination with enterprise edition to do some log shipping so
that I can build a reporting server.
Both the OS and the RDBMS are 32-bit for now, but moving to 64-bit in the
very near future.
Thanks for the matrix, I have been looking for that for the last couple of
days now. Much appreciated.
Thanks,
Robert
"Bud Y. Zer" wrote:
> Ah, you're right. I read memory 'requirements' in your original post, not
> 'specifications'.
> My mistake.
> Now, what platform of SQL Server and windows are you running: 32bit or 64
> bit?
> This matrix might help:
> http://www.microsoft.com/sql/evalua...ew/default.mspx
>
>
> "Robert Koros" <RobertKoros@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:2B3AA119-EE86-4D94-ADCF-8B986937AB92@.microsoft.com...
>
>
I am trying to find out the Capacity Specifications when SQL Server
Enterprise Edition or Standard Edition is running on Windows 2003 Enterprise
Edition server. I have the specifications for Windows 2000 Server, but I
cannot find out the specs when W2K3 is the OS. I am looking for the maximum
memory allowed, number of processors, etc.
Thanks,
RobertThey should be the same.
"Robert Koros" <RobertKoros@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:9AD71CFD-E6B8-450D-B680-1F74BB955BBB@.microsoft.com...
> Good afternoon,
> I am trying to find out the Capacity Specifications when SQL Server
> Enterprise Edition or Standard Edition is running on Windows 2003
> Enterprise
> Edition server. I have the specifications for Windows 2000 Server, but I
> cannot find out the specs when W2K3 is the OS. I am looking for the
> maximum
> memory allowed, number of processors, etc.
> Thanks,
> Robert|||Unfortunately they aren't. It would make sense, but there is a chart that I
saw for SQL Server 2000 running on W2K3 EE and there was a substanial
increase in the allowed memory, 32GB I believe. I am in the process of
building a new box/SAN and I want to know what the specs are for this OS.
"Bud Y. Zer" wrote:
> They should be the same.
> "Robert Koros" <RobertKoros@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:9AD71CFD-E6B8-450D-B680-1F74BB955BBB@.microsoft.com...
>
>|||Ah, you're right. I read memory 'requirements' in your original post, not
'specifications'.
My mistake.
Now, what platform of SQL Server and windows are you running: 32bit or 64
bit?
This matrix might help:
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/evalua...ew/default.mspx
"Robert Koros" <RobertKoros@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:2B3AA119-EE86-4D94-ADCF-8B986937AB92@.microsoft.com...[vbcol=seagreen]
> Unfortunately they aren't. It would make sense, but there is a chart that
> I
> saw for SQL Server 2000 running on W2K3 EE and there was a substanial
> increase in the allowed memory, 32GB I believe. I am in the process of
> building a new box/SAN and I want to know what the specs are for this OS.
> "Bud Y. Zer" wrote:
>|||I am running SQL Server Enterprise Edition, but I am adding some additional
servers and a SAN as the number of databases, and therefore the load on my
current production server, is expanding. I was/am hoping to use standard
edition in combination with enterprise edition to do some log shipping so
that I can build a reporting server.
Both the OS and the RDBMS are 32-bit for now, but moving to 64-bit in the
very near future.
Thanks for the matrix, I have been looking for that for the last couple of
days now. Much appreciated.
Thanks,
Robert
"Bud Y. Zer" wrote:
> Ah, you're right. I read memory 'requirements' in your original post, not
> 'specifications'.
> My mistake.
> Now, what platform of SQL Server and windows are you running: 32bit or 64
> bit?
> This matrix might help:
> http://www.microsoft.com/sql/evalua...ew/default.mspx
>
>
> "Robert Koros" <RobertKoros@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:2B3AA119-EE86-4D94-ADCF-8B986937AB92@.microsoft.com...
>
>
Memory Specifications for SS EE running on W2K3 EE
Good afternoon,
I am trying to find out the Capacity Specifications when SQL Server
Enterprise Edition or Standard Edition is running on Windows 2003 Enterprise
Edition server. I have the specifications for Windows 2000 Server, but I
cannot find out the specs when W2K3 is the OS. I am looking for the maximum
memory allowed, number of processors, etc.
Thanks,
RobertThey should be the same.
"Robert Koros" <RobertKoros@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:9AD71CFD-E6B8-450D-B680-1F74BB955BBB@.microsoft.com...
> Good afternoon,
> I am trying to find out the Capacity Specifications when SQL Server
> Enterprise Edition or Standard Edition is running on Windows 2003
> Enterprise
> Edition server. I have the specifications for Windows 2000 Server, but I
> cannot find out the specs when W2K3 is the OS. I am looking for the
> maximum
> memory allowed, number of processors, etc.
> Thanks,
> Robert|||Unfortunately they aren't. It would make sense, but there is a chart that I
saw for SQL Server 2000 running on W2K3 EE and there was a substanial
increase in the allowed memory, 32GB I believe. I am in the process of
building a new box/SAN and I want to know what the specs are for this OS.
"Bud Y. Zer" wrote:
> They should be the same.
> "Robert Koros" <RobertKoros@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:9AD71CFD-E6B8-450D-B680-1F74BB955BBB@.microsoft.com...
> > Good afternoon,
> >
> > I am trying to find out the Capacity Specifications when SQL Server
> > Enterprise Edition or Standard Edition is running on Windows 2003
> > Enterprise
> > Edition server. I have the specifications for Windows 2000 Server, but I
> > cannot find out the specs when W2K3 is the OS. I am looking for the
> > maximum
> > memory allowed, number of processors, etc.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Robert
>
>|||Ah, you're right. I read memory 'requirements' in your original post, not
'specifications'.
My mistake.
Now, what platform of SQL Server and windows are you running: 32bit or 64
bit?
This matrix might help:
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/evaluation/overview/default.mspx
"Robert Koros" <RobertKoros@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:2B3AA119-EE86-4D94-ADCF-8B986937AB92@.microsoft.com...
> Unfortunately they aren't. It would make sense, but there is a chart that
> I
> saw for SQL Server 2000 running on W2K3 EE and there was a substanial
> increase in the allowed memory, 32GB I believe. I am in the process of
> building a new box/SAN and I want to know what the specs are for this OS.
> "Bud Y. Zer" wrote:
>> They should be the same.
>> "Robert Koros" <RobertKoros@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:9AD71CFD-E6B8-450D-B680-1F74BB955BBB@.microsoft.com...
>> > Good afternoon,
>> >
>> > I am trying to find out the Capacity Specifications when SQL Server
>> > Enterprise Edition or Standard Edition is running on Windows 2003
>> > Enterprise
>> > Edition server. I have the specifications for Windows 2000 Server, but
>> > I
>> > cannot find out the specs when W2K3 is the OS. I am looking for the
>> > maximum
>> > memory allowed, number of processors, etc.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Robert
>>|||I am running SQL Server Enterprise Edition, but I am adding some additional
servers and a SAN as the number of databases, and therefore the load on my
current production server, is expanding. I was/am hoping to use standard
edition in combination with enterprise edition to do some log shipping so
that I can build a reporting server.
Both the OS and the RDBMS are 32-bit for now, but moving to 64-bit in the
very near future.
Thanks for the matrix, I have been looking for that for the last couple of
days now. Much appreciated.
Thanks,
Robert
"Bud Y. Zer" wrote:
> Ah, you're right. I read memory 'requirements' in your original post, not
> 'specifications'.
> My mistake.
> Now, what platform of SQL Server and windows are you running: 32bit or 64
> bit?
> This matrix might help:
> http://www.microsoft.com/sql/evaluation/overview/default.mspx
>
>
> "Robert Koros" <RobertKoros@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:2B3AA119-EE86-4D94-ADCF-8B986937AB92@.microsoft.com...
> > Unfortunately they aren't. It would make sense, but there is a chart that
> > I
> > saw for SQL Server 2000 running on W2K3 EE and there was a substanial
> > increase in the allowed memory, 32GB I believe. I am in the process of
> > building a new box/SAN and I want to know what the specs are for this OS.
> >
> > "Bud Y. Zer" wrote:
> >
> >> They should be the same.
> >>
> >> "Robert Koros" <RobertKoros@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> >> news:9AD71CFD-E6B8-450D-B680-1F74BB955BBB@.microsoft.com...
> >> > Good afternoon,
> >> >
> >> > I am trying to find out the Capacity Specifications when SQL Server
> >> > Enterprise Edition or Standard Edition is running on Windows 2003
> >> > Enterprise
> >> > Edition server. I have the specifications for Windows 2000 Server, but
> >> > I
> >> > cannot find out the specs when W2K3 is the OS. I am looking for the
> >> > maximum
> >> > memory allowed, number of processors, etc.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> >
> >> > Robert
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
I am trying to find out the Capacity Specifications when SQL Server
Enterprise Edition or Standard Edition is running on Windows 2003 Enterprise
Edition server. I have the specifications for Windows 2000 Server, but I
cannot find out the specs when W2K3 is the OS. I am looking for the maximum
memory allowed, number of processors, etc.
Thanks,
RobertThey should be the same.
"Robert Koros" <RobertKoros@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:9AD71CFD-E6B8-450D-B680-1F74BB955BBB@.microsoft.com...
> Good afternoon,
> I am trying to find out the Capacity Specifications when SQL Server
> Enterprise Edition or Standard Edition is running on Windows 2003
> Enterprise
> Edition server. I have the specifications for Windows 2000 Server, but I
> cannot find out the specs when W2K3 is the OS. I am looking for the
> maximum
> memory allowed, number of processors, etc.
> Thanks,
> Robert|||Unfortunately they aren't. It would make sense, but there is a chart that I
saw for SQL Server 2000 running on W2K3 EE and there was a substanial
increase in the allowed memory, 32GB I believe. I am in the process of
building a new box/SAN and I want to know what the specs are for this OS.
"Bud Y. Zer" wrote:
> They should be the same.
> "Robert Koros" <RobertKoros@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:9AD71CFD-E6B8-450D-B680-1F74BB955BBB@.microsoft.com...
> > Good afternoon,
> >
> > I am trying to find out the Capacity Specifications when SQL Server
> > Enterprise Edition or Standard Edition is running on Windows 2003
> > Enterprise
> > Edition server. I have the specifications for Windows 2000 Server, but I
> > cannot find out the specs when W2K3 is the OS. I am looking for the
> > maximum
> > memory allowed, number of processors, etc.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Robert
>
>|||Ah, you're right. I read memory 'requirements' in your original post, not
'specifications'.
My mistake.
Now, what platform of SQL Server and windows are you running: 32bit or 64
bit?
This matrix might help:
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/evaluation/overview/default.mspx
"Robert Koros" <RobertKoros@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:2B3AA119-EE86-4D94-ADCF-8B986937AB92@.microsoft.com...
> Unfortunately they aren't. It would make sense, but there is a chart that
> I
> saw for SQL Server 2000 running on W2K3 EE and there was a substanial
> increase in the allowed memory, 32GB I believe. I am in the process of
> building a new box/SAN and I want to know what the specs are for this OS.
> "Bud Y. Zer" wrote:
>> They should be the same.
>> "Robert Koros" <RobertKoros@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:9AD71CFD-E6B8-450D-B680-1F74BB955BBB@.microsoft.com...
>> > Good afternoon,
>> >
>> > I am trying to find out the Capacity Specifications when SQL Server
>> > Enterprise Edition or Standard Edition is running on Windows 2003
>> > Enterprise
>> > Edition server. I have the specifications for Windows 2000 Server, but
>> > I
>> > cannot find out the specs when W2K3 is the OS. I am looking for the
>> > maximum
>> > memory allowed, number of processors, etc.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Robert
>>|||I am running SQL Server Enterprise Edition, but I am adding some additional
servers and a SAN as the number of databases, and therefore the load on my
current production server, is expanding. I was/am hoping to use standard
edition in combination with enterprise edition to do some log shipping so
that I can build a reporting server.
Both the OS and the RDBMS are 32-bit for now, but moving to 64-bit in the
very near future.
Thanks for the matrix, I have been looking for that for the last couple of
days now. Much appreciated.
Thanks,
Robert
"Bud Y. Zer" wrote:
> Ah, you're right. I read memory 'requirements' in your original post, not
> 'specifications'.
> My mistake.
> Now, what platform of SQL Server and windows are you running: 32bit or 64
> bit?
> This matrix might help:
> http://www.microsoft.com/sql/evaluation/overview/default.mspx
>
>
> "Robert Koros" <RobertKoros@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:2B3AA119-EE86-4D94-ADCF-8B986937AB92@.microsoft.com...
> > Unfortunately they aren't. It would make sense, but there is a chart that
> > I
> > saw for SQL Server 2000 running on W2K3 EE and there was a substanial
> > increase in the allowed memory, 32GB I believe. I am in the process of
> > building a new box/SAN and I want to know what the specs are for this OS.
> >
> > "Bud Y. Zer" wrote:
> >
> >> They should be the same.
> >>
> >> "Robert Koros" <RobertKoros@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> >> news:9AD71CFD-E6B8-450D-B680-1F74BB955BBB@.microsoft.com...
> >> > Good afternoon,
> >> >
> >> > I am trying to find out the Capacity Specifications when SQL Server
> >> > Enterprise Edition or Standard Edition is running on Windows 2003
> >> > Enterprise
> >> > Edition server. I have the specifications for Windows 2000 Server, but
> >> > I
> >> > cannot find out the specs when W2K3 is the OS. I am looking for the
> >> > maximum
> >> > memory allowed, number of processors, etc.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> >
> >> > Robert
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)