Hi,
My sql server is running on a Windows 2000 server with 2G physical memory
machine and I'm looking at the private-bytes performance counter for
sqlservr process and it's taking 1.8G. Is that something I should be
concerned about? I assume that sqlserver can be smart in taking most
possible available memory - so that would explain it. But how do I know when
I should be concerned - in the case 1.8 is the actual minimum it needs to
run efficiently (constantly swapping memory with page file is not efficient
of course).
In another word, how do I know when to start investing in more hardware for
my sql server?
thanks!Have a look at
INF: SQL Server Memory Usage
http://support.microsoft.com/defaul...b;en-us;q321363
http://www.mssqlserver.com/faq/trou...-memoryleak.asp
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
"Zen" <zen@.nononospam.com> wrote in message news:uolOKk9YGHA.4688@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...[vb
col=seagreen]
> Hi,
> My sql server is running on a Windows 2000 server with 2G physical memory
> machine and I'm looking at the private-bytes performance counter for
> sqlservr process and it's taking 1.8G. Is that something I should be
> concerned about? I assume that sqlserver can be smart in taking most
> possible available memory - so that would explain it. But how do I know wh
en
> I should be concerned - in the case 1.8 is the actual minimum it needs to
> run efficiently (constantly swapping memory with page file is not efficien
t
> of course).
> In another word, how do I know when to start investing in more hardware fo
r
> my sql server?
> thanks!
>[/vbcol]
Wednesday, March 21, 2012
memory used by sqlservr
Labels:
database,
memory,
memorymachine,
microsoft,
mysql,
oracle,
performance,
physical,
private-bytes,
running,
server,
sql,
sqlservr,
windows
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment